Showing posts with label WS-BusinessActivity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label WS-BusinessActivity. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 8, 2007

WS-TX has made version 1.1 an OASIS standard

pencil icon, that"s clickable to start editing the post

The X-members of the shinning WS-star just keeps producing new standards. Now it's WS-Transaction version 1.1 that's become an OASIS standard. It's also one more of these standards to consist of multiple specifications, here the three (from the OASIS standards list):

  • Web Services Coordination (WS-Coordination) v1.1
  • Web Services Atomic Transaction (WS-AtomicTransaction) v1.1
  • Web Services Business Activity (WS-BusinessActivity) v1.1

I'm not sure what happened to version 1.0, if there ever was one cause I can't find it on the WS-TX TC homepage. Judging from the list of companies that has participated in this standard, it looks much more promising than when I looked at WS-Context (maybe they are more related that i know of, but doesn't really change my view on it). Since I'll probably never have time to look into this standard I'll take the version short description of the specifications from the press release:

WS-Coordination enables an application service to create the context necessary for propagating an activity to other services.
WS-AtomicTransaction defines agreement protocols for short-lived activities having the all-or-nothing property.
WS-BusinessActivity defines protocols for long-running transactions that require compensation-based agreement.
Working together, these specifications enable existing transaction processing, workflow, and other systems to hide their proprietary protocols and operate in a heterogeneous environment

Read more

Monday, March 26, 2007

WS-RX, WS-SX and WS-TX - what's the status?

pencil icon, that"s clickable to start editing the post

In the current version of the WSRM from the WS-RX TC, it says:

Many errors can interrupt a conversation. Messages can be lost, duplicated or reordered. Further the host systems can experience failures and lose volatile state.

This got me thinking that why has it to be a conversation and even though I haven't read it yet I guess it doesn't have to, but ex. there is no need for in-order if there is just one message, so it could just be this way to have an advanced use case/scenario. Any way this and the stuff about setting up a context made me recall that I once looked at the WS-Secure Conversation proposal at some time - how does that fit in? I went on a search and discovered that there actually three exchange TC's in Oasis:

So what specifications are they working on and what's the status?

OASIS Web Services Reliable Exchange (WS-RX) TC

The following specification sets produced by this TC underwent the first Public Review cycle from Aug 24, 2006 to Oct 21, 2006:

Doesn't say when they expect it to be final.

OASIS Web Services Secure Exchange (WS-SX) TC

There has been a public review for the WS-Trust and WS-SecureConversation specifications, as described in the Public Review Announcement, and it was from the 5 September 2006 to the 14 November 2006:

Here again I haven't found any time estimate for the final standards.

OASIS Web Services Transaction (WS-TX) TC

This is the most actual with the 3 specifications listed below in Technical Work Produced by the Committee are the approved Committee Specifications that the OASIS membership is considering (throughout March 2007) adopting as an OASIS Standard.

SO these could soon become final and real standards.

Read more